The second salvo in htis summer's comic-book-movies war has been fired. Sin City was the first, Batman Begins followed yesterday ... and Marvel brings up the rear with The Fantastic Four in July (as an aside, looking at the release dates on IMDb, I see that the movie is being released in the US a week after other worldwide releases, including India ... WTF?!)
So I went to see Batman Begins last night ... and had to settle for decent seats at the back of the theater (the queue stretched around the theater!) I must say that while Christian Bale is no Michael Keaton or Val Kilmer, he certainly captures the essence of the tortured vigilante quite well. The problem with the other Batman movies, I've always felt, is that they choose to explain the villains in more detail ... why is the Penguin so bitter? How did Two Face come to be? They never really explain what goes on in the mind of Bruce Wayne, or the Batman. This is probably the best Batman movie I have seen ... of
course, in the league of Batman movies, Batman Begins has to contend
against the psychadelic campiness of Adam West's Batman, and the
extremely cheesy and bad Joel Schumacher one.
Visually, the movie excels - Gotham has never looked so brooding, or so menacing on screen. And since this movie talks about the origins of the Batman, and so doesn't have the spit 'n' shine polish that other Batman movies had (and here, I'm referring to Tim Burton again, not the other abominations that have plagued mankind through the ages). If I hold anything against Christian Bale, its that he looks a bit pouchy in the face when he dons the mask ... and I don't know whether he fakes the raspy lisp in the movie, but I really hated that!
The love interest role was put into the movie more as an afterthought I think ... a sort of LoTR-esque decision along the lines of "We can't have an all-male cast! We must appeal to women too!" I was kind of hoping (as I didn't read much about this angle of the movie), that Batman's love interest might have been Talia, Ra's Al Ghul daughter ... sigh. Gary Oldman seemed a little subdued ... I'm not sure she does good guy roles to well. I associate him too much with the bad-guys ... Count Dracula ... Zorg (The Fifth Element) ... Sirius (OK .. Sirius was a good guy ... in a way! He was more the anti-hero figure).
I did think Liam Neeson was channeling the soul of Qui-Gon Jinn, of course. I half-expected him to say "The Force is strong with you, young Wayne". (Spoiler Alert!) I was a little disappointed that Ken Watanabe had such a small role as Ra's Al Ghul. If you follow the comic books, you'll know that Ra's Al Ghul is a near-immortal, using the Lazarus Pit to replenish himself through the ages. And because of that, I was extremely disappointed to find that the story killed off Ken Watanabe, and turned Liam Neeson into Ra's Al Ghul ... who died at the end as well ... Or did he? Hmmm ...
Because of the focus on the psychology of Bruce Wayne/ Batman, the character development of the Supervillains - Scarecrow & Ra's Al Ghul - wasn't as strong as I'd hoped it would be (again, refer to the Tim Burton movies). I know I complained earlier that Tim Burton's movies didnt talk about what drives the Batman as uch as it talks about his enemies, but I guess I'm saying there should be some sort of balance in the character development, and so far the movies have been Supervillain-focussed, or (now) Batman-focussed.
But I suppose the inevitable sequel would spend a little more time going over Supervillain origin stories. Speaking of sequels, I'm rooting for Mark Hamill to play the Joker. For those of you wondering why I picked Luke Skywalker to be an Uber-villain, I point you to the most excellent and stylized animated Batman series produced by Warner Bros. The shows air on Cartoon Network and WB on Saturdays, and I believe a few DVDs are out as well. To me, this is the definitive version of Batman on-screen, ans Mark Hamill is The Joker!
One other point to mention - Michael Caine probably isn't the best choice for Alfred. A butler is supposed to be sophisticated, suave, and dry-humored. He's not supposed to sound like a Cockney fighter who's moved up and out of the East Docklands! However, Michael Caine's Alfred does bring some moments of comic relief ... albeit, very cheekily. Pick Stephen Fry (best known for playing Jeeves in "Jeeves & Wooster")!
Recent Comments